Ceramic Industry
  Home
  Subscribe
  Digital Edition Subscribe
  CyberNews Subscribe
  Editor's Blog
  PPP HotSpot
  Subscription Customer Service
  Online
  Classified Ads
  Services Marketplace
  Buyers' Connections
  Ad Index
  Calendar
  Today's Headlines
  Cover Story
  Features
  Columns
  Products
  Online Extras
  Resources
  Archives
  Digital Edition Archives
  Career Center
  CyberNews Archives
  Advanced Ceramics & Glasses Digest eNews Archives
  Directories
  Videos
  Podcasts
  Reference
  Market Research
  Web Seminars
  CI Info
  About CI
  Contact Us
  Media Kit
  Reprints
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Guest Blog: The Trouble with the TSCA
by Myra Warne
March 24, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare



Earlier this month, I attended a stakeholders meeting regarding changes in the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) that affect the ceramic industry. In October 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) indicated its intention to reclassify several categories considered to be “statutory mixtures” for the past 30 years under the TSCA. Included are glass, oxide chemicals, frits, ceramic materials and wares, and portland cement. The agency claims it is simply issuing a clarification, while industry believes that this is a reversal of longstanding regulatory policy that is required to proceed through the rulemaking process.

CerMA recently became involved in this issue and will represent the industry’s point of view, along with SGCDpro and other organizations. The American Chemistry Council is the lead organization opposing this change. Industry believes that the EPA’s position is inconsistent with 30 years of guidance and advice to the industry, and we have submitted evidence to substantiate this. The EPA believes that there have likely been significant changes in the chemical composition of ceramics, frits and related products during this time period.

If the EPA is successful in changing its long-standing position on this issue, literally thousands of ceramic formulations will have to be submitted to the EPA for examination and approval. This will have a far-reaching effect on our industry, increasing costs, decreasing options for manufacturers, decorators and consumers, and clogging an already overwhelmed government agency with thousands of requests for product certification. Once submitted, the EPA would have the option of approving or disapproving the product for sale in the U.S. This action would apply to products imported into the U.S., as well as those manufactured here.

Additional details and discussion will be available at the CerMA meeting in Nashville on April 19. For more information, call (740) 588-0828 or visit www.cerma.org.


Myra Warne
myrawarne@yahoo.com
Myra Warne is executive director of the Ceramic Manufacturers Association (CerMA) and the Society of Glass and Ceramic Decorated Products (SGCDpro). She served as publisher of Ceramic Industry magazine from 1991-1996. Prior to that, she worked for the American Ceramic Society.

Links

|PrintEmail
  Comments (0)Post a Comment
 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.






BNP Media
© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. The publisher is not responsible for product claims and representations. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent those of Ceramic Industry, its staff, Editorial Advisory Board or BNP Media. | Privacy Policy