SPECIAL REPORT/THERMAL ANALYSIS: Measuring Thermal Conductivity
by Adam Harris
June 1, 2008
A recent development of the modified transient plane source (MTPS) technique offers an innovative solution to the traditional challenges of thermal conductivity measurement.
Whether for development or quality control
purposes, obtaining accurate thermal conductivity data for ceramics presents
numerous challenges to industry. Traditional methods are cumbersome,
time-consuming and offer little flexibility for integration with more advanced
production processes due to sample format restrictions.
By contrast,
a recent development of the modified transient plane source (MTPS) technique
offers an innovative solution to these challenges while providing a rapid,
nondestructive test method that requires no advanced training requirements to
operate. The MTPS technique offers a significant advancement in the measurement
of thermal conductivity of ceramics, and offers flexibility for the testing of
solids, liquids, powders and pastes as well. The MTPS-based sensor can be
incorporated as an in-line quality control measurement for better process
control in the manufacturing of ceramics.
Technique
 |
| Figure 1. The sensor includes a central heater/sensor element in the shape of a spiral surrounded by a guard ring. |
|
The MTPS technique employs a new system that
is comprised of a sensor, control electronics and computer software.* The
sensor includes a central heater/sensor element in the shape of a spiral
surrounded by a guard ring. The guard ring generates heat in addition to the
spiral heater, thus approximating a one-dimensional heat flow from the
sensor into the material under test in contact with the sensor (see Figure 1).
*C-Therm TCi TM thermal
conductivity analyzer.
|
|
| Figure 2. Voltage drop chart. |
|
The voltage drop on the spiral heater is
measured before and during the transient (see Figure 2), and the voltage data
is then translated into the effusivity value of the tested material. The
conductivity is calculated from the voltage data by a patented iterative method. Effusivity
is defined as the square root of the product of thermal conductivity (k), density (r) and
specific heat capacity (c p), and has units of
KmsW 2:
e = (kρc p) 1/2
The system measures effusivity directly and determines conductivity from this
measurement as well. The system automatically compensates for variations in
sensor temperature, thus enabling reliable measurements over a wide range of
temperatures (-50 to 200ºC).
Sample Results for Solids
For illustrative and comparative purposes in
testing a solid ceramic, Pyroceram ® was tested
with the MTPS sensor. Pyroceram was originally developed for military
applications and is now commonly used for various domestic purposes (e.g.,
cooking utensils). The thermal conductivity of the material is a key product
performance attribute. Results obtained with the MTPS technique at ambient
operating conditions are presented in Table 1. These results were obtained in
under five minutes.
As a comparison point offered from a third-party lab, the University of
Maryland’s Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering (CALCE) reports a thermal
conductivity for Pyroceram of 3.96 W/mK for approximate ambient conditions via
the traditional flash method (following ASTM E1461-92 Standard Test Method for Thermal
Diffusivity of Solids by the Flash Method). The difference in the two methods’
reported values is less than 1.5%. The flash method employed in CALCE’s
characterization of the material is well-known and provides a highly accurate
measurement. The technique is advantageous in a number of circumstances,
particularly in testing samples above 200ºC.
The principle points of difference between the flash and MTPS methods are the
greater convenience and flexibility that the MTPS technique offers. The flash
technique requires the sample to be reduced to specific geometry. In addition,
if the sample is transparent, it must be coated with either a gold or graphite
coating. The flash measurement also relies on inputted sample bulk density in
calculating the thermal conductivity from the the direct measurement of the
sample’s diffusivity and calibrated determination of heat capacity.
Other traditional methods of thermal conductivity measurement, such as the
guarded hot plate (GHP) technique, also require specific sample dimensions, which is often
expensive and destructive to accommodate. The GHP technique is also susceptible
to errors arising from the non-realization of the assumed boundary or
steady-state conditions. In contrast, the flash and MTPS methods for measuring
thermal conductivity both remove the steady-state condition at the expense of
measuring the temperature as a varying function of time. 1
The MTPS technique is unique in its ability to nondestructively test any flat
surface greater than 17 mm in diameter. Test times per measurement via the MTPS
method are as short as one second.
|
|
| Figure 3. MTPS test procedure. |
|
Furthermore, since the samples are not
altered by the MTPS method, other equipment can still be used after testing is
complete (an important feature for researchers). The speed and small sample
size gives the technology an advantage in studying experimental formulations.
Overall, the simplified process and flexibility demonstrated by the MTPS
technique in measuring thermal conductivity, as illustrated in Figure 3, offers
a striking contrast to the traditional GHP and flash methods.
Due to the upper temperature limitation of 200ºC for MTPS equipment, the
technique is employed in a complementary fashion to the traditional flash
technique in maximizing asset utility and operator time in some quality control
scenarios. The MTPS technique is applied to shoulder the bulk of
high-throughput testing as a screening tool, while the flash technique is
reserved for the more labor-intensive high-temperature testing requirements.
Sample Results for Powders
 |
| Figure 4. Small-volume test kit accessory. |
|
The MTPS technique also offers the
flexibility to test the thermal conductivity of powders. With use of a
small-volume test kit (minimum sample volume 1.8 mL), such as the one shown in
Figure 4, the MTPS method can accurately measure the thermal conductivity of a
wide range of powder materials. In highlighting this capability, powdered
zirconium oxide was tested with the MTPS sensor.
Zirconium
oxide is an advanced ceramic used in the manufacture of opacifiers,
electronics, sensors, abrasives, catalysts, high-temperature filler and
insulation, and wear-resistant ceramic products. 2 The
material offers the advantages of having a very low thermal conductivity while
remaining chemically inert up to very high temperatures. The results for the
testing of the zirconium oxide powder are shown in Table 2.
Conclusion
The new MTPS-based analyzer offers
researchers and technicians significant latitude in the study and
characterization of a wide range of sample formats in the ceramic field. Both
solid samples and powders can easily be tested, with results available in
minutes. The MTPS’ operating temperature range is -50 to 200ºC, and the
technique offers accuracy and precision comparable to traditional methods for
thermal conductivity testing.
The key advantages of the MTPS method include a significantly shorter test
time, greater ease of measurement and wider sample flexibility. As thermal
conductivity takes on greater importance in the development and production
control of ceramics, the MTPS technique provides researchers and manufacturers
with a powerful new approach.
For additional information regarding thermal
conductivity testing options, contact C-Therm Technologies Ltd. at 863 Union
St., Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3A 3P7; (877) 827-7623 or (506)
457-1515; fax (506) 454-7201; e-mail sales@ctherm.com; or visit the website at www.ctherm.com.
|