• Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • Home
  • The Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Edition
    • CIAdvanced Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Archives
  • News
  • Features
  • Resources
    • Advertiser Index
    • Blogs
    • Raw and Manufactured Materials Overview
    • eNewsletters
    • Classifieds & Services Marketplace
    • Buyers' Connection
    • List Rental
    • Market Trends
    • Material Properties Charts
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • CI Top 12
    • Virtual Supplier Brochures
  • Directories
    • Data Book & Buyers Guide
    • Ceramic Components Directory
    • Materials Handbook
    • Equipment Digest
    • R&D Lab Equipment and Instrumentation
    • Services Directory
  • CI Home
Home » IP in Depth: Unscrupulous Activities of Non-Practicing Entities Continue
CI Advanced FeaturesAdvanced CeramicsIP in DepthTopicsColumnsGlassRefractories

IP in Depth: Unscrupulous Activities of Non-Practicing Entities Continue

A NPE is an entity that holds a patent for a product or process but has no intention of developing it.

IP in Depth, Michael Gzybowski
February 1, 2016
Michael Gzybowski
KEYWORDS general business / innovation / intellectual property / patents
Reprints
No Comments

Last year saw 5,769 new patent suits filed in federal district courts, representing a 15% increase over the previous year, with non-practicing entities (NPEs) filing two out of every three of these suits. Not surprisingly, over the same period of time, 1,797 new petitions were filed at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) with NPEs on the receiving end of 58.4% of petitions filed at PTAB, where inter partesreviews represented 91.9% of all petitions filed. Unified Patents, Inc. included these statistics in a report released January 41 and Kevin Jakel, Unified Patents’ CEO, was quoted in LAW360 as stating, “We can conclude that patent assertion appears to provide a lucrative return for investors, patent owners and contingency lawyers given the continued level of activity.”2

In general, a NPE is an entity that holds a patent for a product or process but has no intention of developing it. A patent troll is a type of NPE that amasses large numbers of patents with the intention of launching patent infringement suits against companies and individuals that they maintain have illegally used some element of something for which they hold the patent. In the U.S., the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) uses the term patent assertion entities (PAEs) to distinguish patent trolls from non-practicing entities that have different motives, such as universities and other research organizations and individual inventors lacking the resources to further develop something they have designed or created.

Patent trolls neither use nor market the inventions covered by their patents, but instead make money by threatening or filing patent infringement lawsuits. An average NPE litigation will cost $1.75 million from filing to completion (including litigation and settlement costs). When confronted with treats by NPEs, defendants have to consider the uncertainty and unpredictability of the outcome of jury trials, especially when patent trolls threaten or file suits in plaintiff-friendly forums such as the Eastern District of Texas. Accordingly, there is incentive for defendants to avoid litigation by agreeing to pay a licensing fee that is akin to extortion. From 2010 to 2013, the median damage awards to patent trolls was $8.5 million. Since 2010, patent trolls have made three times as much money in court as real companies have.

Often a defendant in a patent infringement suit will counter claim patent invalidity and/or counter infringement of the defendant’s own patent(s). However, in the case of a NPE, the NPE plaintiff does not produce products or provide services so there is no risk of infringement by a NPE. Last year’s increase in petitions for inter partesreviews before the PTAB represents validity challenges to patents which, in the case of NPE patent holders, defendants can file to stay litigation pending the outcome of such reviews.

Federal legislation continues to wrestle with how to effectively thwart patent trolling while allowing legitimate patent owners to enforce their rights. Twenty-seven states now have enacted anti-patent troll legislation, which is aimed at punishing bad faith patent infringement assertions. The target of such litigation is based on patent trolls attempting to overreach with broad, unsupported or vague claims intended to fleece defendants. Member-based organizations like Unified Patents and patent risk management companies like RPX Corp. offer protection strategies against patent trolls. But for the time being, patent assertion will remain lucrative for NPEs.  


References

1. http://unifiedpatents.com/2015-year-end-report/.

2. Law360, New York (January 5, 2016, 12:24 a.m.).


Any views or opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not represent those of Ceramic Industry, its staff, Editorial Advisory Board or BNP Media.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Ceramic Industry Magazine.

Recent Articles by Michael Gzybowski

IP Makes America Great

Track One Prioritized Examination

Taking Advantage of the Post-Prosecution Pilot Program

Using Examiner Interviews to Advance Patent Applications

Post-Issuance Challenges to Patent Validity

Michael-gzybowski-107px

Michael Gzybowski, counsel at Brinks Gilson & Lione, concentrates his practice on patent prosecution, providing support for patent litigation and counseling clients on patentability, infringement and validity issues, and licensing agreements. Gzybowski has more than 30 years of experience, including his work as a patent examiner at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He can be reached at (734) 302-6046 or mgzybowski@usebrinks.com.

Related Articles

IP in Depth: Expedited Patent Appeals

Post-Issuance Challenges to Patent Validity

IP in Depth: Understanding Supplemental Patent Examinations

IP in Depth: Evaluating Patent Examiners

Related Products

Handbook of Advanced Ceramics Machining

Crystals in Glass: A Hidden Beauty

Fractography of Glasses and Ceramics V

Processing and Properties of Advanced Ceramics and Composites III: Ceramic Transactions, Volume 225

Related Events

Ceramics Expo 2018

Materials Science & Technology 2017

Global Composites

ceramitec 2018

Related Directories

Innovnano-Advanced Materials S.A.

Morgan Advanced Materials

Prince Minerals LLC

Innovnano-Advanced Materials S.A.

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • eNewsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Customer Service

More Videos

CI directories

Products

Handbook of Advanced Ceramics Machining

Handbook of Advanced Ceramics Machining

Ceramics, with their unique properties and diverse applications, hold the potential to revolutionize many industries, including automotive and semiconductors.

See More Products

CI raw and manufactured materials

Ceramic Industry Magazine

CI August 2017 Cover

2017 August

The summer's heating up in our August issue! Check out articles on Industry 4.0 projects, drying considerations, physical vapor deposition coatings, and more.
View More Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Advertiser Index
    • List Rental
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • Manufacturing Group
    • Partners
    • Want More?
    • Connect
    • Privacy Policy

Copyright ©2017. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing