- THE MAGAZINE
- NEW PRODUCTS
- Advertiser Index
- Raw & Manufactured Materials Overview
- Classifieds & Services Marketplace
- Product & Literature Showcases
- List Rental
- Market Trends
- Material Properties Charts
- Custom Content & Marketing Services
- CI Top 10 Advanced Ceramic Manufacturers
- Virtual Supplier Brochures
What makes this type of system even more attractive is that its initial cost is often half or less of a conventional dry injection/fabric filter (baghouse) system, and operating costs are also lower, representing a significant savings for brick plants. In addition to demonstrating the necessary efficiency, this new scrubber is simple to operate and requires minimal maintenance.
Handling Discharge LiquidSeveral questions are often asked about this approach to emissions control. First, many operators immediately want to know how scrubber discharge liquid is best handled. Fortunately, this question was paramount to original system design. In a word, the discharge is a “trickle.” It helps to understand that even though several hundred gallons per minute (gpm) may be recirculated continuously inside the scrubber, only a trace quantity of water is actually needed for blowdown, or discharge.
Further, one manufacturer has discovered that the insoluble fluoride salts that are formed from the collected HF gases during neutralization can be returned to the brick body without scum or efflorescence effects on the fired brick. This either eliminates discharge or greatly reduces the need to a fraction of a gallon per minute for flushing collected soluble salts out of the scrubber loop (primarily chlorides). For comparison, imagine a leaky faucet—that represents the flow of water needed for discharge for many applications, much less than 1 gpm.
Annual Operating CostsOther questions relate to annual operating costs—a major issue with injection systems. The system will operate with a very low pressure drop, keeping fan horsepower requirements low. Reagent costs are low as well due to the use of safe, affordable and readily available slurry of magnesia, rather than large quantities of dusty, dry lime or other calcium-based reagent.
Maintenance RequirementsThe crossflow configuration of the wet scrubber minimizes maintenance due to the vigorous washing action of sprays on durable mass transfer internals. The housing is accessed from the side, a feature that allows for rapid internal inspection and, if necessary, rapid internal maintenance. This inspection and rapid maintenance feature is not even a possibility with baghouse systems, which use dozens of lengthy, heavy and dusty bags. Routine maintenance requirements have also been demonstrated to be quite low on crossflow installations.
Ensuring Regulatory ComplianceRegulatory compliance is assured with this approach. A normally functioning system cannot be operated to let acid gases and particulates pass through. Acid gases are readily absorbed and converted into non-hazardous salts, unlike a baghouse system where corporate compliance officials must concern themselves with the quality of adsorbant or aggregate and the accuracy of broken bag detectors (bags can break during routine operation and then create particulate emission problems).
The new MACT standards are fast approaching and could spell trouble for any facility that generates a certain amount and type of kiln emissions. The only certain way to comply is to install a reliable scrubber capable of meeting all of the regulatory requirements. A crossflow wet scrubber is an economically and technically attractive option that should be carefully evaluated prior to installation of a control system for any brick facility.
For More InformationFor more information about emission control technology, contact Lucas Process Systems, 10800 Sikes Place, Suite 160, Charlotte, NC 28277; (704) 321-2552; fax (704) 321-2445; e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org; or visit http://www.lucasprocess.com.
*Supplied by Lucas Process Systems.
SIDEBAR: The MACT StandardsThe Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is working to implement what it calls Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards—federal regulations developed under Title III of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. These regulations are intended to reduce the emissions of 189 hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) by requiring improved air pollution control equipment and techniques on a wide variety of industrial and commercial sources of air pollution, including brick manufacturing plants.
Most MACT standards apply only to major sources of hazardous air pollutants, defined as facilities that emit or have the potential to emit 10 tons per year (TPY) or more of any HAP or 25 TPY or more of any combination of HAPs. On March 23, 2000, the EPA presented a draft approach of the standards to brick industry representatives. Based on this draft approach, about 100 tunnel kilns with capacities equal to or greater than 10 tons per hour in the brick industry will require some form of control, as well as all new tunnel and periodic kilns. The standards are expected to be proposed this spring and promulgated about one year later, and plants would need to be in compliance anywhere from one to three years after the standards are promulgated.
For more information about the MACT standards, contact Mary Johnson of the EPA at (919) 541-5025.