BCR: The “Final” MACT Rule?

May 1, 2003
/ Print / Reprints /
ShareMore
/ Text Size+
In March, the EPA issued the final National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing and Clay Ceramics Manufacturing, commonly known as the “MACT rule” because it requires the use of a maximum achievable control technology. Although the rule had not yet been published in the Federal Register at the time this article was written, EPA officials believed this would occur by the end of April.

On March 5, 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the final National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing and Clay Ceramics Manufacturing, commonly known as the “MACT rule” because it requires the use of a maximum achievable control technology (MACT). Although the rule had not yet been published in the Federal Register at the time this article was written, EPA officials believed this would occur by the end of April.

The promulgation of the final rule comes just eight months after the proposed rule was issued in July 2002. Based on a number of presentations made at a public hearing in August 2002, as well as more than 80 public comment letters, the EPA made several changes to the rule in the industry’s favor. For example, in the proposed rule, the MACT floor was based on the use of dry lime injection fabric filters (DIFF), dry lime scrubber/fabric filters (DLS/FF) or wet scrubbers (WS). After considering the industry’s comments and observing a dry limestone adsorber (DLA) operating in a brick plant, the EPA decided that DLAs are the only currently available technology that can be used to retrofit existing kilns without causing a significant potential impact on the production process. The EPA therefore revised the final rule to allow the use of DLAs on these kilns. However, the rule continues to champion DIFF, DLS/FF and WS as appropriate technologies for new large tunnel kilns and for reconstructed large tunnel kilns that were equipped with DIFF, DLS/FF or WS prior to reconstruction.

Other areas of the rule were left unchanged despite arguments and data supporting the industry’s position. For example, industry members were hoping that the design capacity limit would be raised to 10.1 Mg/hr (11.1 tph) or 12.1 Mg/hr (13.3 tph), based on available data, but the EPA decided not to change the limit in the final rule. According to the EPA, the smallest tunnel kiln with MACT floor controls (i.e., with DLA controls reflecting the existing source MACT floor under the final rule) listed in its database has a capacity of 8.3 Mg/hr (9.1 tph). The EPA said it believes that rounding up to 9.07 Mg/hr (10 tph) is an appropriate subcategorization level. Many industry members continue to believe that this limit is too low and that enforcing it will negatively affect the brick industry.

A judicial review of the final rule can be obtained by filing a petition for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit within 60 days after the final rule is published in the Federal Register, but it is still unclear whether the brick industry intends to pursue this option. Ceramic Industry will continue to follow this matter closely and will provide updates as they become available.

Editor's note:

A PDF copy of the final rule can be viewed at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/caaa/t3pfpr.html. For the latest news and information about MACT and other brick and ceramic industry issues, revisit the magazine's Web site.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Ceramic Industry Magazine.

Recent Articles by Christine Grahl

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Multimedia

Videos

Image Galleries

In-Depth Features

These articles detail innovative advanced ceramic and glass materials and technologies.

Podcasts

Sapphire: An Extreme Performer

Ian Doggett of Goodfellow and CI Editor Susan Sutton discuss the benefits and opportunities provided by industrial sapphire.

More Podcasts

THE MAGAZINE

Ceramic Industry Magazine

CI April 2014 cover

2014 April

Our April issue features details on advanced materials such as ceramic matrix composites and piezoelectric ceramics, among many others. Be sure to check it out!

Table Of Contents Subscribe

THE CERAMIC INDUSTRY STORE

M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\Ceramics Industry\handbook of advanced ceramics.gif
Handbook of Advanced Ceramics Machining

Ceramics, with their unique properties and diverse applications, hold the potential to revolutionize many industries, including automotive and semiconductors.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.

Directories

CI Data Book July 2012

Ceramic Industry's Directories including Components, Equipment Digest, Services, Data Book & Buyers Guide, Materials Handbook and much more!

STAY CONNECTED

facebook_40px twitter_40px  youtube_40pxlinkedin_40