Engineer's Perspective: Defining Quality

October 1, 2002
/ Print / Reprints /
/ Text Size+
In an ideal world, people would never make mistakes, materials would always meet specifications and processes would always run according to plan. But employees are human, raw materials and components vary, and processes drift, making quality control/assurance (QC/QA) programs a necessary part of ceramic manufacturing operations. To establish and maintain a viable QC/QA program, someone within the company must determine what constitutes a “shippable” product. Unfortunately, quality is very much like beauty—it is in the eye of the beholder.

Case in Point

At one company, the president (who was also the chief stockholder) expressed his displeasure to the QC manager concerning the relatively low amount of returns. He believed the returns should be about 3% of the monthly shipments. If returns were greater than 3%, the quality level was not sufficient and had to be improved; if returns were less than 3%, production was spending too much time (and money) on the products. The president based his standards on the “law of diminishing returns” and said that the additional costs of increasing quality levels (i.e., reducing returns below 3%) would lower the maximized rate of return on shareholder equity.

In another situation, a company purchased a closed plant and re-employed some of the past workers. The workers, thankful for an opportunity to work, wanted to produce high-quality goods so they could please the customers and have stable jobs. With this commitment to quality, the workers were dismayed when the plant manager began sorting through scrap bins, pulling out rejected parts and placing them on the trays for further processing. The plant manager felt that many of the rejected parts were “good enough” for shipment. No one realized at the time that the plant manager received a bonus based upon quantity shipped. His bonus was not adjusted for the number of products that were returned or credits that were issued.

At yet another company, the incoming QC department rejected a very large lot of components. After reviewing all internal manufacturing and QC records for the components, the supplier felt strongly that the customer’s specifications were being met and sent a technical representative to the facility to discuss the problem. While observing the incoming inspection procedures at the customer’s facility, the representative raised some questions concerning the criteria that were used to select parts for defect analysis. When the incoming QC inspector modified the sample selection procedure, the lot was found to meet the specifications and was kept. No one ever questioned the actual quality of the parts. The representative was relieved to have prevented the return. But what if all the paperwork and procedures were correct, and the parts weren’t really suitable for the application? The QC inspector didn’t know how the parts were supposed to function in the final assembly—the decision to accept or reject was strictly a matter of documentation and procedure.

On the Receiving End

My mother recently received a pacemaker. I could not help but wonder whether all QC documents and procedures were in order, and whether those documents actually reflected the pacemaker’s quality…or if someone in production had a different opinion on what was “good enough” for shipment…or even if that pacemaker was one of the 3% of a lot that contributed to the manufacturer’s maximized shareholder equity.

Quality is not an absolute. As a result, the perception of what constitutes a “quality product” often varies from person to person and from company to company. However, one view on quality is common in all cases: Every person believes that the products they buy should be high quality products, without faults, defects or failures—just like the person receiving a pacemaker.

What is your expectation of quality when you buy something? What perspective of quality do you want the manufacturer of that product to follow? Is it the same quality perspective you apply when you produce your products?

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Ceramic Industry Magazine.

Recent Articles by Reed Slevin

You must login or register in order to post a comment.



Image Galleries

In-Depth Features

These articles detail innovative advanced ceramic and glass materials and technologies.


Sapphire: An Extreme Performer

Ian Doggett of Goodfellow and CI Editor Susan Sutton discuss the benefits and opportunities provided by industrial sapphire.

More Podcasts


Ceramic Industry Magazine

CI April 2014 cover

2014 April

Our April issue features details on advanced materials such as ceramic matrix composites and piezoelectric ceramics, among many others. Be sure to check it out!

Table Of Contents Subscribe


M:\General Shared\__AEC Store Katie Z\AEC Store\Images\Ceramics Industry\handbook of advanced ceramics.gif
Handbook of Advanced Ceramics Machining

Ceramics, with their unique properties and diverse applications, hold the potential to revolutionize many industries, including automotive and semiconductors.

More Products

Clear Seas Research

Clear Seas ResearchWith access to over one million professionals and more than 60 industry-specific publications,Clear Seas Research offers relevant insights from those who know your industry best. Let us customize a market research solution that exceeds your marketing goals.


CI Data Book July 2012

Ceramic Industry's Directories including Components, Equipment Digest, Services, Data Book & Buyers Guide, Materials Handbook and much more!


facebook_40px twitter_40px  youtube_40pxlinkedin_40