The modification of a kiln's combustion design can
achieve fuel savings of 30-45%, as well the added benefits of upgraded controls
and safety systems.
Much of my kiln work these days is associated with fuel
consumption and energy conservation. Companies are struggling with high fuel
costs as natural gas prices continue to rise. Extra energy costs impose
additional profit erosion on many businesses, particularly those firing
commodity products that compete with offshore companies employing cheap labor
and raw materials, and enjoying government-subsidized energy and minimal
pollution requirements.
Compounding the problem is the fact that many companies
no longer employ skilled staff engineers who can analyze how to conserve energy
effectively without eroding product quality. As a result, many American
companies are nearly paralyzed as fuel prices continue to increase.
The Good Old Days
In the '70s, the application of high-velocity excess air
(XSA) burners was the norm. These burners increased circulation inside kilns to
a great degree, resulting in faster firing cycles with higher product yields.
The burners were designed with extraordinary XSA capabilities-in excess of
2000%-and were able to operate with jet temperatures as low as 200°F when used
with high levels of XSA.
Periodic kilns could be started with all burners lighted
simultaneously and were able to adhere to the time/temperature curves desired,
even when starting at low temperatures. The downside was that large quantities
of XSA increased the kilns' fuel consumption significantly. The extra fuel
consumption imposed by these systems was not a major cost issue at the time
since fuel costs were low, however, and the improved yield and higher
productivity resulted in lower costs overall.
To produce favorable circulation within a kiln, the
burner jet velocity must be high. Not only does the high-velocity (400+ mph)
jet create circulation, but the entrainment of air into the burner stream
decreases the ultimate jet temperature, eliminating hot spots. Designers tended
to use fixed air input to all of the burners because high air inputs assured
high velocity and circulation; control of temperature was achieved by varying
the fuel input. The process maximized circulation but fostered high fuel usage.
Many XSA design schemes were used well into the '90s to
enhance temperature capability, but the end result is universally high fuel
consumption. XSA also increases the level of NO
x
produced, as the oxygen content of the kiln atmosphere is maximized in most of
these systems.

Figure 1. Schematic of a traditional oscillation firing
system.
What Can You Do?
I've studied combustion design and the fuel consumption
of hundreds of kilns, and have participated actively in adjustments and
modifications of systems to conserve fuel. Many older kilns are well designed
with excellent mechanical systems and lightweight refractory linings. If you
have such systems, you may find relief from the burden of high fuel costs. If
fuel consumption is a concern, however, modifying the kiln's combustion system
can provide relief.
In the past four years, eight older kilns (produced
between the 1970s and the late 1990s) have been modified with a system that was
first produced in 1985.* All of the kilns that were upgraded had originally
employed an "oscillation" system, in which burners firing beneath and
above the load varied in air and fuel output to effect a sweeping action of the
burner gases. Generally, as the burners' output on one side of the kiln
increased, the burner output on the other side of the kiln decreased. This
output oscillation continued in cycles of 60 to 120 seconds (see Figure 1).
The sweeping action of the burners gradually moved the
impact point of the opposing burners across the width of the kiln setting, and
assisted in obtaining temperature uniformity across the bottom of the load.
Temperature was controlled by increasing or decreasing the fuel input of the
burners, which normally resulted in high levels of excess air.
* Integrated Multi-Zone Pulsing
System
TM, developed by GFC Kilns International Ltd., Melbourne, Australia.

Table 1. Results of recent kiln upgrades.
Making the Upgrade
The design of the modified combustion system involves
considerably more than simply adding pulsing components to the existing
burners. Generally, the modifications include a rearrangement of the kiln
burners to provide better circulation around the load, and, typically, the
elimination of 30% of the existing burners.
Kiln zoning is also modified. Normally, these large kilns
only use four control zones before modification, and the upgrade system
converts the kiln to as many as 21 control zones after the retrofit. Further,
the zones communicate with each other via PLC logic algorithms to avoid zone
interactions.
New PLC-based kiln controls are added, along with an
interface program. The system plots time and temperature, along with fuel and
kiln oxygen levels, pressure, etc., on a real-time basis. The software was
written by kiln engineers and developed jointly with customer input. The result
is both user friendly and informative.
Safety equipment (i.e., fuel and air controls) is brought
into current NFPA or FM compliance during the upgrade, and additional air
injection ports are included to provide increased air input for cooling. The
burners are controlled in different modes depending on the cycle and product.
Typical modes include:
- Excess Air-very high levels of excess air are
used at the start of the firing cycle to create a gentle start. All zones
control at a starting set point of 200°F, thereby avoiding any initial
temperature "bumps" that might create product cracking.
- Partial Excess Air-some excess air is used and
the amount is continuously controlled. The objective of this mode is to provide
good circulation while eliminating the excessive air that consumes high amounts
of energy.
- On Ratio-the burners fire with the slightest
amount of excess air possible to provide approximately 2.5% O2 content in the
kiln atmosphere.
- Cooling-the burners are extinguished, and air
is injected into the kiln burners and extra cooling ports as needed to maintain
the desired cooling curve.
All of these modes are selectable through the interface
software-no physical burner adjustments are needed to alter the burner firing
parameters.
Normally, system installation requires a couple of weeks
and is followed by burner calibration and test firings. During the test
firings, fuel use in each of the segments of the firing curve is analyzed, and
the use of each mode is fine tuned to provide the best production quality at
the lowest amount of fuel consumption. As shown in Table 1, modifications have
achieved documented fuel savings ranging from 30 to 45%.
Reaping the Rewards
The payback on a retrofitted system is very attractive,
ranging from as little as six months to two years. The return is particularly
impressive because, in addition to fuel savings, the upgrade provides a renewed
control system with PLC, software and updated safety compliance.
Fuel costs have tripled-or more-in the past decade, and
are projected to continue their rise. If you have an older kiln in good
condition, modification of the combustion design can offer a very handsome fuel
benefit, while at the same time replacing obsolete controls and upgrading the
safety system.
For more information regarding kiln combustion
design modifications, contact GFC Kilns International Ltd., 227 Princes Hwy.,
Dandenong, Melbourne, Victoria, 3175, Australia; (613) 9792-5211; fax (613)
9792-5605; e-mail tim@gfckilns.com.au;
or visit www.gfckilns.com.au.Links