Efficiency can be improved by making a few fundamental changes in
the way a kiln is operated with reduced output. At a time when plants are
struggling to achieve breakeven with low revenue, this technique can help brick
manufacturers reduce fuel consumption.
Plants often have to curb the
output of their kilns during economic slow-downs. This is no problem with
periodic kilns, since they needn’t be fired as often and the fuel consumption
in BTU/lb is normal. Continuous tunnel kilns do present challenges in
efficiency when output is reduced, however.
We all know
that the efficiency of tunnel kilns depends to a great extent on the cycle time
of the ware processed. The fixed input to the kiln varies, but a reasonable value
is around 50% of the fuel consumed at fast cycles. This fraction of the input
doesn’t go away, even if the push cycle is slowed drastically. As a result, the
input must be amortized over fewer and fewer pieces of ware, meaning the BTU/lb
value increases significantly.
Efficiency
can be improved, even at slower cycles, by making a few fundamental changes in
the way the kiln is operated with reduced output. At a time when plants are
struggling to achieve breakeven with low revenue, this technique can help brick
manufacturers reduce fuel consumption.

Figure 1. Typical firing curve for a tunnel kiln firing face brick on a 24-hour cold-to-cold cycle.
Case in Point
As an example, consider a tunnel kiln that
normally fires face brick on a rapid schedule of 24 hours cold-to-cold. Figure
1 illustrates a typical curve. In this cycle, the initial heating rate is
around 140ºF/hour
up to 1400ºF.
Oxidation from 1400 to 1700ºF takes four hours, and 1700ºF to soak
requires an additional four hours. Finally, the soaking time is an hour. Let’s
assume that this is the fastest possible cycle.
When the kiln is slowed to half speed, the new cycle is 48 hours, and normally
the only changes that are made would be to reduce the soaking temperature
somewhat to maintain the proper brick absorption. There is nothing wrong with
this method of operation, but knowing what the cycle must be to attain good
properties allows for a different procedure that will save energy.

Figure 2. After reducing the preheating burners, the revised
firing cycle (curve shown in red) for the same kiln closely matches the
original while providing reduced fuel consumption.
Simple Adjustments
Since the optimum firing cycle is known, we
can save a considerable amount of energy by reducing the preheating temperatures.
Energy applied by the preheating burners is essential in fast cycles, but the
burner gases in this part of the kiln can only pass through the load for a
short time before the exhaust system removes them-and some of their energy-from
the kiln.
We can turn off many of the preheating burners in our slow cycle and
still stay below the heating maximum rates acceptable to the brick. This has
the effect of reducing the exhaust temperature, therefore saving a significant
amount of fuel. The new curve (in red) is shown in Figure 2.
Although the heating rates look different when drawn this way, they
closely match the black curve that represents the standard cycle. The heating
rates are similar for both curves, and the oxidation time is the same. The
soaking temperature is slightly lower because we have twice as much time
available at the depressed cycle. Most importantly, the fuel savings using this
technique are significant.
When applying this technique, we need to be sure that we maintain the exhaust
temperature at a level high enough to avoid condensation. We also need to keep
an eye on heat uniformity to ensure that it doesn’t suffer too much without the
benefit of preheat burner circulation. This viable technique will help reduce
fuel consumption in times of decreased demand-which is just when we need to
save as much money as possible.
Links