For the most efficient results, a kiln’s heat input should be compared with the heat absorption capability of the brick setting in all of the kiln’s functional zones.
In
this economic climate, many brick manufacturers are cutting their plants’
output in order to survive. The method presented below allows manufacturers to
redefine their optimal firing schedules based on lower output levels.
Equation
The kiln’s heat input should be compared with the heat
absorption capability of the brick setting in all of the kiln’s functional
zones: preheating, firing and cooling. The required heat input (Hi) is defined
by the heat balance of each functional zone of the kiln. The heat absorption
capability (Ha) is found through the following equation:
Ha = h x S x ∆T
where h = the heat transfer coefficient, which depends on the flow velocities
along the kiln channel and is limited by flow passing resistance; S = brick
setting, which occurs when the surface is opened to direct contact with airflow
and is defined by the package machine and quantity of carts in the kiln
channel; and ∆T = the temperature difference between the airflow and brick,
which depends on the firing curve.
When Hi > Ha, the kiln
works with energy losses; in the case of Hi < Ha, not enough heat is
available for accurate firing. For the optimal firing program, Hi must be equal
to Ha.

Figure
1. Defining optimal flows and heat consumption when the kiln’s output has
changed.
Example
To
find the most efficient firing schedule, the firing parameters in each
functional zone should be adjusted to reach Hi = Ha. In one example, the kiln
was 336 ft long with 28 cars carrying 29,600 lb of brick each. The manufacturer
first analyzed the brick setting geometry to define the surface that was open
for heat flow (S = 1165.8 sq ft), as well as the area available for airflow
passing through the brick setting (A = 21.66 sq ft).
Next,
the manufacturer studied the kiln’s heat balance to determine the theoretically
required hot gas flow in the preheating zone, cold air in the cooling zone, and
fuel consumption in the firing zone. Calculations regarding the heat absorption
capability of the brick setting were then performed and compared with the heat
required for each zone in order to determine if heat was lacking or
excessive.
Calculations varying the hot and cold air input
were then performed for different firing schedules in order to reach the Hi =
Ha state. (The quantities of the cars in the zones did not vary.) Finally, the
company developed a graph that illustrates the optimal firing schedule when the
kiln’s output has been changed (see Figure 1). By following this graph, the
manufacturer has found it simple to define the optimal input and appropriate
heat consumption at different output levels.
For additional information regarding improved firing performance,
contact Credo Engineering, 7920 N. Caldwell Ave., #16, Niles, IL 60714; (847)
912-8940; e-mail valtitov@gmail.com;
or visit www.vtcredo.com. Links