What
steps do manufacturers need to take in order to demonstrate CPSIA compliance?
The Consumer Product Safety
Improvement Act (CPSIA), which was signed into law August 14, 2008, encompasses
a number of new rules for the safe manufacture of children’s products.
(Editor’s note: To learn more about the specific requirements of the CPSIA, see
“Understanding the CPSIA”.)
A major requirement of the new legislation is that manufacturers and
private labelers must submit samples of certain products for lead testing by an
independent laboratory before the products can be imported, warehoused, or sold
in the U.S. However, because the requirements will be phased in over the next
several months, some suppliers have expressed confusion about what is required
and when it will be required. In particular, many companies feel that in-house
testing may be sufficient to demonstrate compliance when, in fact, testing by an
accredited laboratory is required.
Independent Testing
Third-party testing and
certification is a unique provision of the CPSIA, which requires such testing
for any children’s product manufactured after December 22, 2008. Section 102 of
the CPSIA sets forth testing and certification requirements, and specific
details will be announced on the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)
website at
www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/cpsia.html. This section of the act
also requires that all children’s products be accompanied by a certificate of
compliance, based on testing, that specifies the applicable rule, ban,
standard, and regulation being followed. Certificates must be furnished to each
distributor or retailer of the products.
Although the CPSIA specifically requires third-party testing, it does allow for
in-house testing provided that:
- Testing provides equal or greater consumer safety protection as
third-party testing
- Test results are protected from undue influence
- The CPSC is notified of any attempts at (or allegations of)undue
influence
Many companies are flirting with disaster by making their own interpretation of
the law. Some are asking outside labs for a partial test program while
performing other testing in-house. This could prove dangerous because the
in-house test results may not be accepted as valid. The best and safest
approach is to have all testing performed by an accredited third-party lab.
What's an Accredited Lab?
Labs performing third-party
tests that conform to the CPSIA must be accredited to ISO/IEC 17025, and the
accreditation must come from an ILAC-MRA signatory accrediting body. Also, the
scope of the accreditation must expressly include testing to the regulations of
16 CFR 1303, which covers lead tests, particularly testing for lead in
children’s products. Accredited labs are listed on the CPSC website as
“accredited third party test labs able to assess conformity with children’s product
safety rules.”
In the U.S., the major accrediting body for the CPSIA is ACLASS Accreditation
Services. This organization is the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board that
provides laboratory accreditation for testing and calibration laboratories. The
accreditation should cover testing for lead by X-ray fluorescence (XRF),
inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) and inductively coupled
plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) in accordance with 16 CFR part
1303, CPSA HR 4040, ASTM F 963-07, and EN 71-3:1995.
The accrediting body performs an audit of the testing facility to clearly
demonstrate that the lab has control over its internal systems. The audit
includes an examination of test methods and document control (proof that
methods are being followed) and an understanding of the scope of each test
method (uncertainty and limits). In addition, training documentation is checked
to ensure the quality of the personnel running the tests. The aim is to certify
that the lab follows a good quality system.
For more information regarding CPSIA testing
compliance, contact NSL Analytical Services, 4450 Cranwood Parkway, Cleveland,
OH 44128; (216) 438-5200; fax (216) 438-5050; e-mail nsl@nslanalytical.com; or visit the website at www.nslanalytical.com.
SIDEBAR: Testing for Lead
The
typical approach to lead testing is to first scan the object with an XRF gun.
XRF instrumentation determines elemental concentration by analyzing the
emission of characteristic secondary (or fluorescent) X-rays from a material that
has been excited by bombarding it with high-energy X-rays or gamma rays.
The fluorescent radiation can be analyzed either by sorting the photon energies
emitted (energy-dispersive analysis) or by separating the radiation wavelengths
(wavelength-dispersive analysis). Once sorted, the intensity of each
characteristic radiation is directly related to the amount of each element in
the material. CPSC recognizes the XRF as a reliable screening test to detect
the presence of lead, and XRF testing is sufficient if the detected lead
content is no greater than 10 mg or the object being testing has no more than 1
sq cm of surface area.
If the XRF indicates higher levels of lead, ICP or ICP-MS instruments are
employed to determine the exact lead level. ICP instrumentation introduces an
aqueous solution into an extremely hot plasma gas. Light emitted by the atoms
of an element consumed in the plasma is resolved into its component radiation,
and the intensity is measured with a photomultiplier tube or solid state
detector. The intensity of the electron signal is compared to previously
measured standards of known element concentration, and a concentration is
computed.
ICP-MS is a highly sensitive type of mass spectrometry that can determine element
concentrations below one part per trillion. It is based on coupling an ICP
instrument (to produce ions) with a mass spectrometer (to separate and detect
the ions). As in ICP analysis, a photomultiplier tube or chip detector measures
the light intensity to determine the presence or absence of specific elements.
Links