• Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
  • Home
  • The Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Digital Edition
    • CIAdvanced Digital Edition
    • Subscribe
    • Archives
  • News
  • Features
  • Resources
    • Advertiser Index
    • Blogs
    • Raw and Manufactured Materials Overview
    • eNewsletters
    • Classifieds & Services Marketplace
    • Buyers' Connection
    • List Rental
    • Market Trends
    • Material Properties Charts
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • CI Top 12
    • Virtual Supplier Brochures
  • Directories
    • Data Book & Buyers Guide
    • Ceramic Components Directory
    • Materials Handbook
    • Equipment Digest
    • R&D Lab Equipment and Instrumentation
    • Services Directory
  • CI Home
Home » Using Examiner Interviews to Advance Patent Applications
CI Advanced FeaturesAdvanced CeramicsIP in DepthTopicsColumns
IP in Depth

Using Examiner Interviews to Advance Patent Applications

It may be hard to imagine that patent applicants and examiners have common goals.

IP in Depth, Michael Gzybowski
September 1, 2016
Michael Gzybowski
KEYWORDS general business / innovation / intellectual property / patents
Reprints
No Comments

From 2008 to 2012, the percentage of examiner interviews conducted for U.S. patent applications nearly doubled from about 15 to 30%. In 2012, 90% of applications in which examiner interviews were conducted were allowed, compared to a 61% allowance rate for patents in which no interviews were conducted. These trends have continued.

Examiner interviews can increase the probability of an allowance and reduce the number of written responses, thereby reducing the cost of patent prosecution and limiting potential estoppel. The First Action Interview Pilot (FAIP) Program that began in 2011 enables applicants to discuss applications with an examiner before receiving a First Office Action on the merits. The first action allowance rate for applications in the FAIP Program is currently 29.8%, compared to 11.9% for new, non-continuing applications.


Interview Help and Tips

To help applicants prepare for interviews with examiners, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provides Interview Practice Guidelines for Applicants and Interview Practice FAQs online, as well as an entire Interview Practice webpage. Interview Best Practices, developed in a collaborative effort between the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) and the USPTO, states that interviews are intended to “help to advance prosecution and identify patentable subject matter in accordance with the patent statutes,” and cautions that “examiners and applicants should not conduct interviews as adversaries, but rather, should conduct interviews with the objective of meeting the common goals of advancing prosecution and resolving issues.”

When examiners initially reject 90% of all applications and average nearly three rejections in every allowed application, it can become difficult for an applicant not to feel like patent prosecution is an adversarial, win/lose process. It may be hard to imagine that applicants and examiners have common goals that they are trying to achieve. However, an understanding of the examiner’s situation can be helpful. An examiner interview can provide an opportunity to work in a cooperative manner with an examiner to further the prosecution of an application. 

While examiners are encouraged to hold interviews with applicants, examiners are only given one hour of “non-examining time” to prepare for, conduct, and document interviews. Being mindful and respectful of examiners’ time is important. According to the Manual of Patent Examining Procedures (MPEP), “It is the responsibility of all participants to see that the interview is not extended beyond a reasonable period, usually 30 minutes.”

An examiner’s interview should forward the prosecution, and to this end examiners will generally request an applicant to submit an agenda with proposed claim amendments. During an examiner interview, an applicant should not re-present the same position/arguments previously presented on the record and should resist presenting alternative multiple claim proposals for the examiner’s consideration that were not submitted prior to the interview. “Fishing expeditions” that are attempts to “sound out” examiners or are used as an opportunity to propose random claim amendments while trying to obtain agreement on an allowance should be avoided. It should be the examiner’s exclusive option to volunteer what he/she feels is allowable.

Developing a good relationship with an examiner during an interview can be invaluable whether or not agreement is reached. If agreement is not reached, the application will remain in the examiner’s jurisdiction and it will be necessary to continue to work with the examiner. In the likelihood that an applicant has and/or will have other applications before the same examiner, seeding and developing a good working relationship with the examiner will yield future benefits. Examiners will generally be willing to conduct an interview at any stage of the prosecution when they foresee that an interview will advance the prosecution of an application.  


Michael Gzybowski is an intellectual property attorney with Brinks Gilson & Lione. He has over 30 years of experience, including serving as a patent examiner at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office prior to entering private practice. He can be reached at mgzybowski@usebrinks.com.

Any views or opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not represent those of Ceramic Industry, its staff, Editorial Advisory Board or BNP Media.

Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to Ceramic Industry Magazine.

Recent Articles by Michael Gzybowski

IP Makes America Great

Track One Prioritized Examination

Taking Advantage of the Post-Prosecution Pilot Program

Post-Issuance Challenges to Patent Validity

Michael-gzybowski-107px

Michael Gzybowski, counsel at Brinks Gilson & Lione, concentrates his practice on patent prosecution, providing support for patent litigation and counseling clients on patentability, infringement and validity issues, and licensing agreements. Gzybowski has more than 30 years of experience, including his work as a patent examiner at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He can be reached at (734) 302-6046 or mgzybowski@usebrinks.com.

Related Articles

IP in Depth: Unscrupulous Activities of Non-Practicing Entities Continue

IP in Depth: Evaluating Patent Examiners

Post-Issuance Challenges to Patent Validity

Track One Prioritized Examination

Related Products

Handbook of Advanced Ceramics Machining

Advanced Structural Ceramics

Ceramics for Environmental and Energy Applications: Ceramic Transactions, Volume 217

Processing and Properties of Advanced Ceramics and Composites III: Ceramic Transactions, Volume 225

Related Events

8th Annual Battery Safety

expoAIR: International Aerospace Supply Chain and Technology

Ceramics Expo 2018

Materials Science & Technology 2017

Related Directories

PremaTech Advanced Ceramics

Innovnano-Advanced Materials S.A.

Astro Met Advanced Ceramics Inc.

Morgan Advanced Materials

You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • Print & Digital Edition Subscriptions
  • eNewsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Customer Service

More Videos

CI directories

Products

Handbook of Advanced Ceramics Machining

Handbook of Advanced Ceramics Machining

Ceramics, with their unique properties and diverse applications, hold the potential to revolutionize many industries, including automotive and semiconductors.

See More Products

CI raw and manufactured materials

Ceramic Industry Magazine

CI August 2017 Cover

2017 August

The summer's heating up in our August issue! Check out articles on Industry 4.0 projects, drying considerations, physical vapor deposition coatings, and more.
View More Subscribe
  • Resources
    • Advertiser Index
    • List Rental
    • Custom Content & Marketing Services
    • Manufacturing Group
    • Partners
    • Want More?
    • Connect
    • Privacy Policy

Copyright ©2017. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing