- THE MAGAZINE
- Advertiser Index
- Raw & Manufactured Materials Overview
- Classifieds & Services Marketplace
- Buyers' Connection
- List Rental
- Market Trends
- Material Properties Charts
- Custom Content & Marketing Services
- CI Top 10 Advanced Ceramic Manufacturers
- Virtual Supplier Brochures
New trends in learning reflect a changing workforce.
With sluggish growth, reduced resources and tightening budgets as the order of the day, the economy continues to create uncertainty in commercial and government organizations. Even as we await more favorable market conditions, one thing is clear: The makeup of today’s workforce is forever changed. Human resource (HR) professionals must operate with a leaner workforce in which employees, regardless of level, have the capability to lead and execute work in cross-functional teams.
People are now the primary investment within organizations. As such, professional development initiatives must keep pace. Learning programs need to be more agile, adaptive and occur as quickly as possible to maximize the productivity of employees and adjust to a tech-savvy, global workforce with different learning styles.
HR’s New Role
With blended learning, human resource practitioners now have a range of delivery modalities to meet various learning styles within an organization. But that is not enough. HR needs to match learning modalities (e.g., instructor-led, e-training, virtual, peer-to-peer, mentoring, social media) to desired business outcomes and the skills and behaviors needed on the job across a diverse workforce demographic. In this sense, HR is now a true “broker of capability.”
The ESI 2011 Learning Trends Report, a global learning survey directed at a cross-section of commercial and government leaders, confirms that best-in-class organizations need learning methods that:
• Align to an individual’s “moment of need.”
• Develop leadership and other “soft” skills, such as critical thinking and business acumen.
• Translate into tangible and measurable business impact.
Blended learning contrasts with more traditional commodity training that is focused on obtaining credentials. Although credential training is a good starting point, it focuses exclusively on learning content to achieve a certification, rather than on-the-job application.
Just-in-time tools, learning-on-demand and self-paced online learning are just a few methods that organizations are using to ensure learning events are immediately relevant—with the added bonus of cost savings and flexibility by reducing travel and keeping people on the job.
The difficulty, however, lies in the fact that more training choices do not necessarily translate into better results. A blended training approach needs to provide the right information at the point of need to enable an employee to perform effectively. For example, learners who simply need more information on a topic or are seeking to recall information may require a different learning experience than those seeking to apply content to specific on-the-job challenges or organizational changes.
The blending of learning solutions is not simply offering a choice of modalities; it must also take into account content, learning styles, teaching techniques, and learning environments and align to specific learning objectives. A multi-touch, blended learning program therefore must:
• Support the learner’s ability to recall and repeatedly apply content in their work environment.
• Follow and complement the individual’s workflow.
• Reflect and be tailored to support organizational methodologies, culture and technical readiness in order to ensure an engaged and productive workforce.
Leadership Skills Development
An aging and changing workforce means that organizations must plan for a wave of retiring employees while building new talent. To meet this challenge, organizations report an increasing need to develop leadership capabilities in their employees and cite a growing priority to improve skills in stakeholder management, interactive communication, and effectiveness in a cross-functional team environment.
Specifically, the ESI Learning Trends Report shows that 53% of organizations indicate that fostering and encouraging leadership skills in employees is an important area of training investment, coupled with a strong requirement to allocate funds and build business skills/acumen (40%) for technical professionals. Leadership training can move the entire organization forward by:
• Equipping the workforce with skills in critical thinking and business acumen to identify organizational priorities and design the appropriate responses within a business context.
• Supporting a culture of individual accountability to speed decision making, ensure successful project outcomes and, ultimately, ensure organizational effectiveness.
• Rapidly developing the capabilities of less tenured employees to manage and lead successfully to ensure continuity and productivity.
• Achieving a new level of team dynamics to create more integration and cohesion on projects and programs, resulting in greater workforce productivity.
With training and development budgets under strain and scrutiny, HR recognizes the need to move beyond “smile sheets” to post-assessments that track learning transfer and business impact. Learning can and should be a critical business process, enhancing not only individual or team performance, but also having a significant impact on the strategic and financial goals of an organization. If you can measure the business impact of learning, then you are better able to determine how effectively your organization achieves true learning transfer.
The first step is to define the key business impact areas for measurement. Some of these might include increasing quality, increasing productivity, increasing employee engagement, decreasing costs, increasing revenue, increasing customer satisfaction, decreasing cycle time, decreasing risk and increasing effective communication.
Then, set expectations with a measurement strategy. This would include course evaluations completed immediately after training by both the trainee and manager. Another round of measurement 90 days and even six months after the training would help to substantiate behavior change and, ultimately, the business impact of the learning investment.
Quantification is the last—but most critical—step in validating the business case for learning. Producing quantitative and qualitative reports and other high-level output can help prioritize training investments based on real, tangible data showing job impact.
Measuring, of course, assumes that training translates into an actual transfer of learning in the classroom to changed on-the-job performance. For this to happen, organizations must develop a supportive and complementary workplace environment in which management, business processes, and supporting tools all permit the learner to apply new knowledge and skills immediately upon return to work.
Organizations often fail to establish success criteria or identify expectations for learning engagements. This is a key pre-training strategy in order to measure trainee performance against agreed-upon standards.
Learning transfer also happens more effectively with an incentive program to motivate employees, full manager support along with executive sponsorship, and a systematic process to prepare individuals to apply what they have learned. In order to maintain a competitive edge, best-in-class organizations are adopting new approaches to learning, and HR is becoming a “broker” of these blended learning capabilities. In this way, HR adds real value, turning an organization’s workforce into a tangible return on investment by achieving higher quality output, even with fewer resources and lowered budgets.
For more information, visit www.esi-intl.com.